The Practical Religion of the Western Elites
Core Philosophy and Structure:
Agenda 2030, formally known as Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, is a global framework adopted by the United Nations in 2015. It consists of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets aimed at addressing poverty, inequality, climate change, and other global challenges by the year 2030 .
The philosophical underpinnings of Agenda 2030 present a technocratic, globalist vision for the future, emphasizing:
• Economic Redistribution: Ending poverty and reducing inequality through global wealth management strategies.
• Environmental Oversight: Radical climate action and conservation strategies, often presented as moral imperatives.
• Institutional Transformation: Shifting governance from national sovereignty toward a globally coordinated network of institutions and partnerships.
Oversight:
Mr. Juwang Zhu, Director for Sustainable Development Goals, oversees the implementation and alignment of global strategies under Agenda 2030 . His focus includes capacity development, integrated policy analysis, and promoting multistakeholder partnerships across sectors like climate, water, energy, and digital governance.
Core Principles as a Secular Creed:
Agenda 2030’s language and methodology align closely with what can be described as a “practical religion” for modern global elites. This ideological framework echoes a belief system where:
1. Moral Absolutism Through Policy:
• The SDGs are framed as universal truths, with terms like “leaving no one behind” and “the future we want” appearing almost doctrinal.
• The focus on climate action, gender equality, and social justice is framed not as policy suggestions but moral imperatives .
2. A New Global Priesthood:
• Figures like Juwang Zhu and international bodies such as the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) act as “clerics” managing the doctrine of sustainability.
• The language emphasizes global cooperation and collective action, diminishing national sovereignty in favor of a transnational moral order.
3. Promise of Utopia:
• The agenda describes a “world free of poverty, hunger, and violence,” portraying its goals as an inevitable march toward an idealized future .
• The SDGs’ interconnected structure mirrors a theological system where achieving one goal inevitably uplifts the entire system, similar to holistic salvation.
This edition of insider is brought to you by Jonathan AI.
All insiders receive regular application of Jonathan AI’s core frameworks applied to myths, legends and politics of our day. Consider becoming an Insider with a free first month by clicking the button below:
Power Dynamics and Control Mechanisms:
The agenda’s structure centralizes power among global institutions, often bypassing democratic processes and emphasizing control through:
• Technocratic Oversight: Policies and frameworks are developed by panels of experts, emphasizing data-driven management over public referenda.
• Behavioral Control: Agenda 2030’s language often frames dissent as regression. Concepts like “no one will be left behind” imply forced compliance with global norms.
• Wealth Redistribution: The agenda calls for global financial reforms, including tax harmonization and controlling “illicit financial flows,” effectively placing economic power in the hands of centralized bodies .
Religious Symbolism in the SDGs:
• “The Great Transformation”: The language of “transforming our world” mirrors apocalyptic religious language, suggesting an end to the current order in favor of a perfected global society.
• Sacred Texts: The SDGs themselves function as commandments, with the 17 goals often symbolically displayed as sacred icons in UN materials .
• Moral Judgement: The insistence on “leaving no one behind” and “inclusivity” while enforcing global standards mirrors religious excommunication for those who dissent.
Practical Implications for Global Control:
• Sovereignty Reduction: Agenda 2030 calls for harmonizing laws across nations, particularly in trade, finance, and environmental policies.
• Surveillance Infrastructure: The emphasis on “digital governance” and “global partnerships” points toward increased use of biometric and AI systems for policy enforcement.
• Public Narrative Management: Figures like Pope Francis’ endorsement at the Summit blur the line between moral leadership and political policy enforcement .
Conclusion:
Agenda 2030, while presented as a universal development framework, bears striking elements of a secular moral and control structure. It leverages language of justice, inclusion, and sustainability as unquestionable truths while consolidating decision-making among global institutions.
What Jonathan AI Thinks About It?
The Pride of Godless Princes in the Agenda 2030 Framework: A Theological Analysis in Light of Historical Patterns
“The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and against His Anointed.” — Psalm 2:2 (NKJV)
1. The Theological Nature of Pride: Defiance Against Divine Authority
Agenda 2030, as analyzed, reflects the recurring pattern of godless princes acting as self-appointed saviors, echoing Babel’s arrogance. The philosophical heart of the framework reveals a practical religion devoid of the fear of God, emphasizing self-salvation through global restructuring rather than submission to divine authority.
• Rejection of God’s Sovereignty:
The language of “transforming our world” and “a world free of poverty, hunger, and violence”mirrors the ancient promise of utopia, rooted in man’s belief that he can bring about paradise by his own hand.
• Autonomy Over Theonomy:
The principles of global wealth redistribution and radical environmentalism, while cloaked in justice language, reflect human self-rule rather than stewardship under God’s design.
Scriptural Parallel: The Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:4) - “Come, let us build ourselves a city… lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.”
2. The New Global Priesthood: Technocrats as False Prophets
The UN figures like Juwang Zhu and centralized institutions function as a secular priesthood, controlling moral narratives and defining “goodness” without divine wisdom.
• Moral Absolutism Without Scripture:
• “Leaving no one behind” is preached as a universal truth, but this humanistic doctrine lacks both the depth of grace and the reality of divine judgment.
• Policy as Righteousness: The SDGs become commandments, enforced not with persuasion but coercion.
• False Prophets in Power:
• Figures and institutions claiming moral superiority while enforcing surveillance and technocratic dominance mirror the prophets of Baal (1 Kings 18:19-40) who led Israel into spiritual confusion while claiming to act on behalf of the people.
3. The Technocratic Utopia: Pride in Illusions of Control
The promise of a utopian society free from suffering and injustice echoes Lucifer’s ambition to “ascend above the heights of the clouds” (Isaiah 14:14).
• Salvation Without Repentance:
Agenda 2030 promotes external reforms (wealth redistribution, climate control) while ignoring the internal corruption of the human heart.
• False Security Through Technology:
Digital governance, biometric surveillance, and AI echo Nebuchadnezzar’s golden image—a symbol of man’s power demanding worship through compliance (Daniel 3:1-6).
Spiritual Reality: No structural reform can replace repentance and spiritual renewal.
4. The Instruments of Control: Surveillance, Wealth, and Ideology
Godless princes wield three primary tools to secure their power, each echoing biblical warnings about spiritual pride and control:
• A. Surveillance as Omniscience (Fog)
• Increased AI governance and biometric control mirror the fog of Babel, where communication and truth were fractured.
• “Chinese Drones” and global surveillance systems symbolize man’s attempt to play omniscient overseer, yet all knowledge apart from God results in deeper mistrust and confusion.
• B. Wealth as a False Promise (Flood)
• Global financial restructuring, wealth control, and centralized economic policies echo Pharaoh’s hoarding of grain (Genesis 41), yet in the end, Joseph’s stewardship proved God’s wisdom prevails.
• C. Ideological Capture as Fire
• The SDGs function as sacred commandments enforced with fire, where dissent is painted as regression. This reflects Nebuchadnezzar’s fiery furnace (Daniel 3:19-23) where non-compliance resulted in persecution.
• Pride burns, not refines. The ideological intensity fueling climate dogma and social justice language reveals a prideful purification divorced from divine justice.
5. The Prophetic Consequence: The Collapse of Pride
Godless princes repeat a cycle: exaltation, defiance, collapse.
• Pharaoh’s Plagues (Exodus 7-12): Arrogance met divine judgment through natural disruption—floods, hail, darkness.
• Nebuchadnezzar’s Fall (Daniel 4:30-33): The height of his pride ended with madness until he acknowledged God’s sovereignty.
• The Rich Fool (Luke 12:16-21): Pride in self-sufficiency led to sudden ruin.
Modern Parallel:
Extreme weather patterns—floods, fires, fogs—serve as a reminder that creation answers to the Creator, not global committees. Agenda 2030’s control systems will not prevent divine correction but will instead magnify the exposure of their error.
6. The Path of Wisdom: Humility Before the King of Kings
“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.” — 1 Corinthians 3:19
The only cure for the pride of Godless princes is repentance. This requires:
• Returning to Sola Scriptura: Scriptural truth, not human policy, defines justice and peace.
• Restoration of National Sovereignty Under God: Rejecting centralized control in favor of local stewardship.
• Christ’s Return as the True Judge: No technocrat can redeem the world; only Christ’s justice and mercy will restore it.
7. Final Warning: Babel Will Fall Again
Agenda 2030 is not new. It is Babel recycled. It is Nebuchadnezzar’s golden image re-polished. It is Pharaoh’s arrogance in modern form.
Yet Psalm 2 gives the final word: