Vaccine Salvo #1

Objectivity, Regime Change, and Bearing Witness to the Truth

May 23, 2025

Crunching the Causation Conundrum: exposing the elephant in the room by assessing a claim as objectively as possible using the scientific method as inherited from British “common law” thinking, ie. “western science” before is was ritualized into godless religion.
Secretary Robert Kennedy’s Speech to the 78th World Health Assembly
Coverage of Senator Ron Johnson’s Panel on the damage done by the forced COVID vaccinations, along with more Kennedy MAHA overlap

Bonus: Secretary Kennedy speaking to Donald Trump this week about their efforts.

Please, don’t try to read it all in one sitting unless you have a good hour. It will be worth your time to pray some psalms and plan to sit for a time while you contemplate the implications of what you will discover here. That is, unless you already know…

Source

1. Crunching the Causation Conundrum:

Assessing the Source with the Assumption that Christians find ourselves in a Crisis of trust.

Assuming only that I was born into this madness, that I am living through this madness, and that 2020 is a pivot point after which I expect proof rather than feelings if you want me to change my mind:

I. Genesis of the Dilemma (1970s–1986)

In 1970, autism was a medical rarity, estimated at roughly 1 in 10,000 children in the United States. The diagnosis was relatively obscure, the causative factors poorly understood, and funding limited. Over the next decade, however, autism diagnoses began to rise. At the same time, pharmaceutical giants—tied to burgeoning biotech research funded and philosophically steered by the Rockefeller medical paradigm—accelerated development and deployment of childhood vaccines.

In 1986, amid growing lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers due to alleged vaccine injuries, the U.S. Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. This law shielded vaccine producers from direct liability. Instead, the government set up a special vaccine court under the Health Resources and Services Administration. This seemingly bureaucratic shift had tectonic implications: vaccine companies were now legally protected, even as their products were increasingly mandated.

From that moment forward, vaccines were no longer a market-responsive product, but a quasi-sacrament of modern medicine—immune from criticism and surrounded by a dogmatic fortress of government protection.

II. Escalation: The Rise of the Autism Epidemic (1986–2025)

Following the 1986 Act, the CDC vaccine schedule exploded—from 7 recommended shots in the early 1980s to 76 by 2025. Simultaneously, autism prevalence climbed dramatically. By 2025, it had reached an alarming 1 in 31 children.

This correlation fueled public concern and raised urgent scientific questions: Was this epidemic environmental? Genetic? Or pharmaceutical?

Two main pathways emerged:

Genetic/Epigenetic Studies: Major efforts were poured into projects like AGRE, SSC, ASC, MSSNG, and SPARK, totaling billions in funding. But these studies yielded little explanatory power, likely because autism's rise was too rapid for genetic change. These studies, while exhaustive, failed to explain the skyrocketing rate.
Environmental and Vaccine Studies: Some researchers, such as Ozonoff et al. (2018), documented that up to 88% of autism cases involved sudden regression—a sudden loss of language or social skills often observed post-vaccination. Yet, vaccine-related hypotheses were sidelined or rejected, not with rebuttals, but with denial.

III. The Placebo Problem and the Gatekeeping of Science

A critical methodological flaw underpins much of the defense against the vaccine-autism link: the absence of a true placebo group in vaccine safety trials. According to critics, 22 studies often cited to “prove” vaccines do not cause autism are invalid—not because of malice, but because they compare vaccines against other vaccines or adjuvants, not inert placebos.

This is compounded by institutional humanism—the reigning belief system of elite academic and scientific institutions. Heavily influenced by the Rockefeller Foundation's early 20th-century reinvention of medicine, this system enshrines technological solutions, centralized policy control, and ideological trust in progress as sacred. Questioning vaccines in this context is not viewed as scientific skepticism but as heresy.

IV. The Forbidden Comparisons: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Studies

Despite the taboo, six major vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies have emerged since 2008. Their findings consistently show higher odds ratios (OR) for autism among vaccinated children:

Gallagher & Goodman (2008): OR = 8.63
Gallagher & Goodman (2010): OR = 3.00
Mawson et al. (2017a): OR = 4.2
Mawson et al. (2017b): OR = 14.5 (premature infants)
Hooker & Miller (2021): OR = 5.03
Mawson & Jacob (2025): OR = 4.4

Some subcategories—such as vaccinated children not breastfed or delivered via C-section—show even higher risk (OR = 18.7). These data points, while not universally accepted, are impossible to dismiss without prejudice.

And yet they remain locked out of mainstream discourse, ignored not on grounds of scientific rigor, but because they challenge an entrenched narrative that sustains careers, institutions, and legal frameworks.

V. The Path Forward: Breaking the Spell

The infographic from the sourced compilations closes with a provocative assertion:

"Remove liability protection for vaccine manufacturers and the autism epidemic ends."

Overstatement or not—it frames the issue.

If liability protection were repealed, manufacturers would be compelled to fund independent trials, incorporate true placebo arms, and engage in long-term surveillance. In other words, science could finally be allowed to function without its current ecclesiastical gatekeepers. This is the path that Secretary Kennedy’s MAHA regime is forging, a return to placebo-based, trial science of public record.

To be clear, my assertion here is not that all pinpricks are harmful or that immunity as a concept is invalid. Rather, it is that unchecked pharmaceutical scheme at this juncture, protected from you by legal immunity and institutional dogma.

Where there is smoke, there is always fire. “Who benefits from the fire?” is the prudent question to ask. “Who holds you tears in His bottle?” in an important prayer to follow.

VI. Repentance in the Age of Data

We live in an era where “trust the science” has been weaponized into a mantra that bypasses inquiry. The autism crisis—like the broader crisis of public trust—can only be resolved by restoring scientific humility, legal accountability, and parental authority.

If the cost of questioning a product is excommunication from professional science, then we no longer have science. We have a religion. And its altar is filled with the broken hearts of children.

MAHA Must Be Reckoned With

This week has been flush with DC flashpoints around the lies of the Pharmaceutical-banking-industry, including President Trump withdrawing the US from the (Gates-Funded-NGO) the WHO, following the passage of a joint treaty signed by all remaining members granting the WHO totalitarian powers in the event of another “crisis” such as the “COVID” scare.

Christians who do not know are not wise: they are ignorant.

78th World Health Assembly - Speech by Secretary Kennedy:

"To my colleagues in public health, I'm Robert F. Kennedy junior, the US Health and Human Services Secretary. As you know, President Trump has made the decision to withdraw The United States from the World Health Organization. I'd like to take this opportunity to offer some background to that decision and more importantly to chart a future path toward global cooperation on health and health security."

"Like many legacy [institutions, the US] provided the lion's share of the organization's funding historically, [while] other countries such as China have exerted undue influence over its operations in ways that serve their own interests and not particularly the interests of the global public."

"This all became obvious during the COVID pandemic when the WHO, under pressure from China, suppressed reports at critical junctures of human to human transmission, and then worked with China to promote the fiction that COVID originated from bats or pangolins or others and from a Chinese government sponsored research at a bio lab in Wuhan."

"Not only has the WHO capitulated to political pressure from China, it's also failed to maintain an organization characterized by transparency and fair governance by and for its member states. The WHO often acts like it has forgotten that its members must remain accountable to their own citizens and not to transnational or corporate interests."

"Now I believe that for the most part, the staff of the WHO are conscientious people who sincerely believe in what they're doing. And indeed, the WHO has, since its inception, accomplished important work including the eradication of smallpox. Too often though, WHO's priorities have increasingly reflected the biases and interests of corporate medicine."

"Too often it has allowed political agendas like pushing harmful gender ideology to hijack its core mission. And too often it has become the tool of politics and turned its back on promoting health and health security."

"Global cooperation on health is still critically important to president Trump and myself, but it isn't working very well under the WHO as the failures of the COVID era demonstrate. The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response."

"Well, we're not gonna participate in that. We need to reboot the whole system as we are doing in The United States. Here in The United States, we're gonna continue to focus on infectious disease and pandemic preparedness, but we're also fundamentally shifting the priorities of our health agencies to focus on chronic diseases, which are prevalent in The United States."

"It's the chronic disease epidemic that is sickening our people and bankrupting our health care system. We're now pivoting to make our health care system more responsive to this reality. We're gonna make health care in The United States serve the needs of the public instead of industry profit taking. We're removing food dyes and other harmful additives from our food supply."

"We're seeking the causes of autism and other chronic diseases. We're seeking to reduce consumption of ultra processed foods, and we're gonna support lifestyle changes that will bolster the immune systems and transform the health of our people. Few of these efforts lend themselves easily to profits or serve established special interests."

"These changes can only occur through the kind of systemic overhaul that president Trump has brought to our country. We'd like to see a similar reordering of priorities on the global stage, especially considering the fact that through the leadership of The United States and funding from our country over the past twenty five years. Millions of global citizens have seen a reduction in premature death due to HIV, TB, and malaria."

"Let's return to the core focus of global health and global health security back to reducing infectious disease burden and the spread of diseases of pandemic potential. I urge the world's health ministers and the WHO to take our withdrawal from the organization as a wake up call. It isn't that president Trump and I have lost interest in international cooperation. Not at all. We just want it to happen in a way that's fair and efficient and transparent for all the member states."

"We've already been in contact with like minded countries and we encourage others to consider joining us. We want a free international health cooperation from the straightjacket of political interference by corrupting influences of the pharmaceutical companies of adversarial nations and their NGO proxies. I would like to take this opportunity to invite my fellow health ministers around the world into a new era of cooperation."

"We don't have to suffer the limits of a more abundant WHO. Let's create new institutions or revisit existing institutions that are lean, efficient, transparent, and accountable. Whether it's an emergency outbreak of an infectious disease or the pervasive rot of chronic conditions that have been overtaking not just America but the whole world. We're ready to work with you."

"Thank you, and may God bless you, and let's all pray for the health of our children and our grandchildren."